Show Menu
Cheatography

Company Law Cheat Sheet Cheat Sheet (DRAFT) by

Company Law Cheat Sheet

This is a draft cheat sheet. It is a work in progress and is not finished yet.

Business Models

Sole Trader
Exclusive owner of business

Not separate legal entity
Can start trading immediately

No setup costs/formalities

Can keep all profits

Full control over decision making

Complete privacy; no disclosure requir­ements
Unlimited personal liability

Contracts formed between sole trader and third parties
Partne­rship
2 or more persons own business and share profits

Not separate legal entity
Can start trading immediately

No setup costs/formalities

Full control over decision making

Complete privacy; no disclosure requir­ements
Unlimited personal liability

Contracts formed between partners and third parties

A partne­rship agreement will be required otherwise the Partne­rship Act 1890 will apply in default
LLP
2 or more persons carrying on a business

Separate legal entity
All partners have limited liability

Partnership enters contracts with third parties

Flexible management procedures
Set-up costs and formal­ities: LLP must be registered at CH

Must file annual accounts

Disclosure obligations

A members’ agreement will be required otherwise the provisions of the Limited Liability Partne­rship Regula­tions 2001 will apply in default
Private Limited Company
Separate legal entity distinct from its owners
Limited liability: shareh­olders only liable to pay any amount unpaid on their shares

Min. of 1 person required to incorp­orate a company

Easier to raise finance
Set-up costs and formal­ities: Company must be registered at CH

Extensive disclosure obligations

CA 2006 imposes strict requir­ements on how companies are run

Partne­rships

Persons carrying on a business in common with view to profit
Governed by PA 1980 if no partne­rship agreement
PA 1980:
Partners will share equally in profits & losses even where unequal contri­butions to capital;
Not entitled to salary;
Decisions decided by majority;
Partner cannot be expelled by majority vote

Limited Partne­rships

Limited partners
'Sleeping partners'
Not involved in management
General partners
Run business
Unlimited liability
Must be at least 1 limited & 1 general partner
Must register at CH but do not need to file accounts

Who's Who

Shareh­olders
Owners who invest money
Not involved in management
Voting rights
Control key decisions
Membership begins when name entered into company's register of members
Need not be a human being
Subscr­ibers
1st shareh­olders
Directors
Officers/managers
The Board
Owes duty to company
Agent of company
Every company must have at least 1 director who is natural person
Must be at least 16 years old
PSCs
Shareh­olders with over 25% of shares
Details to be provided to CH
Other stakeh­olders
E.g. employees, creditors

Incorp­oration of a Company

How?
From scratch
Purchase shelf company
Requir­ements
Memoradum; articles; fee; form IN01
Change name, articles, registered office, members, directors and secretary details
Post-a­pproval
Certif­icate of incorp­oration with name, registered company number and date of incorp­oration
Already approved as shelf
Legal Entity
From date of incorp­oration
Already legal entity from existing date of incorp­oration

Pre-In­cor­por­ation Contracts

Pre-in­cor­por­ation contract enforc­eable as personal contracts against persons purporting to act on company's behalf ('prom­oters')
Promoters bear personal liability, unless there was express agreement that signatory would not be personally bound by contract
Company cannot ratify contract before it came into existence
Company can obtain benefit of contract made on its behalf pre-in­cor­por­ation by novating it (replacing with new contract)

Shares - Termin­ology

Share
'bundle of rights' and 'personal property' carrying legal and beneficial interests
Nomina­l/par value
Mininum subscr­iption price for that share

Represents a unit of ownership rather than actual value of the share

Share cannot be allott­ed/­issued at discount to nominal

May be issued for more than nominal (the excess over nominal = the 'premium')

Market value of share often higher than nominal value
Issued share capital
Total amount in value (nominal & premium) of all shares in issue at any time
Amount of share capital shown in company accounts
Paid-up share capital
Amount paid by shareh­olders out of the full amount due on their shares
Called-up share capital
Amount of outsta­nding value due on shares which has been demanded by the company
Share capital
Made up of subscriber shares and further shares issues after incorp­oration to new/ex­isting shareh­olders
Allotted Shares
Shares are allotted when person acquires uncond­itional right to be included in register of members in respect of those shares

Confers equitable title only; does not entitle any rights attached
Limited liability
Total nominal value of shares held by shareh­older is equal to total amount of shareh­older's liability to contribute to assets of company if it becomes insolvent

If shareh­older's shares are fully paid, will not have to contribute any further amount on insolvency
Capital
Funds available to run business of a company
Share transfer
Person acquires shares by way of transfer from existing shareh­older
Transm­ission
Where titles to shares devolved other than by transfer (e.g. death, bankrupcy or marriage
Issued Shares
Shares issued when shareh­older has been registered in register of members and title has become complete

Shareh­older Resolu­tions

Some decisions require shareh­older author­isation
E.g. making changes to consti­tution; approval of certain transa­ctions; formal declar­ation of dividends
2 types of resolution
Ordinary: more than 50%
Special: 75% or more
Voting by show of hands:
1 vote per person present at GM
Voting by poll:
1 vote per share held by that person present at GM
Voting by written resolu­tion:
Votes counted out of all shareh­olders entitled to a vote

Must be sent to all eligible members

Time limit of 28 days to respond

Removal of direct­or/­auditor cannot be passed by written resolution
The "­Duo­mat­ic" principle
Informal resolu­tions agreed by all shareh­olders outside of formal meeting, whether expres­s/i­mplied, by verbal­/co­nduct, will be valid and binding
Right to demand a poll
Can be demanded any time before the vote is held

Can be demanded by: chairman; directors; 2 or more persons with right to vote; person(s) with no less than 10% of total voting rights
Right to demand a proxy
Every member entitled to appoint another to exercise all/any of their rights to attend, speak and vote at GM in their place
Quorum
2 qualifying persons (unless it is single member company)

Authority

Express actual authority
Authority has actually been conferred on that person by the principle
Implied actual authority
Arises from appoin­tment to specific role or from course of dealing where board have previously agreed or agreed without protest
Statutory deemed authority
Third parties dealing in good faith entitled to assume directors' powers are free of consti­tut­ional limitations

Threshold to prove bad faith = high (good faith is presumed)

Protects third parties, not directors
Company can sue director and recover compen­sation in CEL caused
Director may be disqua­lified
Ostens­ibl­e/a­pparent authority
Authority of agent as it appears to third party

Representation must have been made by someone with actual authority and third party must have reasonably relied upon this repres­ent­ation
Deemed authority under 'indoor manage­ment' rule
Outsiders are entitled to assume company's internal procedures have been complied with

Of lesser signif­icance now, but still applies when:
i) Third party has not dealt with Board; or
ii) When Q of whether agent was authorised by board applies.

Does not apply when:
i) Third party has actual notice of the irregu­larity or is acting in bad faith
ii) Third party is an insider (e.g. director contra­cting with company)
Ratifi­cation:
Company can ratify acts beyond the actual authority of its agents provided act is within authority of the relevant organ of the company
Involves passing resolution to approve act and agree company will be bound by it

Capaci­ty/­Aut­hority - Summary

Company Liability in Tort

Primary Liability
Vicarious Liability

Company Liability in Crime

Company may be held liable for corporate mansla­ughter
Company commits offence if manner in which its activities are manage­d/o­rga­nised by senior management causes death of person and amounts to gross breach of relevant duty of care owed to person
If guilty, company may be liable to pay fine

Termin­ation of Director

Resign­ation
May resign at any time by giving notice
Will normally be effective and doesn't need to be specif­ically accepted by board
Vacation
Director automa­tically vacates office where:
- prohibited from being a director;
- bankrupt, subject to a compos­ition order made with creditors; or
- physically or mentally incapable
for more than 3 months
Removal - ordinary resolution
Removed by ordinary resolution at GM

28 clear days notice needed before GM can be held

Director allowed to vote in capacity as shareh­older on resolution to remove them

‘Bushell v Faith' clause in articles gives weighed voting rights to directors who are also shareh­olders to effect­ively block ordinary resolution to remove them
Removal - disqua­lif­ication
Mandatory: can last between 2 to 15 years
(Director abused privilege of limited liability, by gross negligence or deliberate disregard of creditors' interests)

Discretionary: can last for up to 10/15 years depending on grounds for disqualification
(Convicted of indictable offence in connection with company manage­men­t/p­rop­erty; persistent breaches; fraud; post-i­nve­sti­gation

Penalties for Breach of Disqua­lif­ication

Criminal offence to act in breach of disqua­lif­ication order (fine/­imp­ris­onm­ent­/both) & personally liable for company debts incurred during breach of disqua­lif­ication
SoS may apply to court for compen­sation order against disqua­lified director where creditors suffered loss due to director's misconduct
SoS may accept disqua­lif­ication undert­aking by any person that for a specified period, that person will not be a director or be involved with promot­ion­/fo­rma­tio­n/m­ana­gement of a company without leave of court

Directors' Duties

Duty to act within powers
Must act within company's constitution

Must exercise powers for proper purposes for which they are conferred
Duty to promote success of company
Must act subjec­tively in good faith to promote company for benefit of its members, having regard to:
- consequences;
- employee interests;
- need to foster business relationships;
- impact on community/environment;
- reputation for high standards of business conduct;
- need to act fairly

Can exemplify these in meeting minutes
Duty to exercise indepe­ndent judgement
Must make decisions of own accord and not be influenced by others

Duty not infringed by acting:
- in accordance with agreement entered into by company that restricts future exercise of discretion by directors;
- in a way authorised by company's consti­tution
Duty to exercise reasonable care, skill and diligence
Must be exercised according with:
- reasonably diligent person with general knowledge, skill and experience reasonably expected of person carrying out those functions; and
- general knowledge, skill and experience of the relevant director

Breach of this can claim damages only
Duty to avoid conflicts of interest
Must avoid direct­/in­direct interests that conflict or may conflict with company's interests

Applies to exploi­tation of property, inform­ation or opportunity

Does not apply to conflict in relation to transa­cti­on/­arr­ang­ement with company

Not infringed if situation cannot reasonably be regarded as likely to give rise to conflict, or if matter has been authorised by indepe­ndent directors

Resigned director continues to be subject to this duty
Duty not to accept benefits from third parties
Must not accept benefit conferred by reason of being a director or doing/not doing anything as a director

Cannot accept bribes or benefit through dividends in another company
Duty to declare interest in proposed transa­ction
If director direct­ly/­ind­irectly interested in proposed transa­cti­on/­arr­ang­ement with company, must declare nature­/extent of interest to other directors prior to company contracting

Disclosure need not be in writing
Duties are cumula­tive: director cannot comply with one duty at expense of another

Piercing the Corporate Veil

Definition
When courts go behind corporate framework and company’s separate legal person­ality to make shareh­olders liable
Not piercing the veil:
Statutes allow members of company to become liable in certain circum­stances but this is not piercing the veil

The single economic entity argument is not a basis for piercing the veil

Parent companies may be liable to those dealing with their subsid­iaries in tort but this is not piercing the veil
Piercing the veil:
Where company was set up as a façade/sham

Concealment principle: doesn’t involve piercing the veil. Corporate structure conceals real actors; court looks behind corporate structure to discover real facts

Evasion principle: court may pierce the veil if a person delibe­rately attempts to evade an existing legal obligation by interp­osing a company which he controls
Even if there has been evasion, the court will try to find another legal remedy at all costs
Extremely rare that piercing the veil will be invoked

Remedies for Breach of Directors' Duties

Shareh­olders may bring a derivative claim on behalf of company where directors have breached their duties
Any relief will be granted to company, not shareh­older who brought claim
Remedial options:
- Account for profits
- Damages
- Rescission
- Injunction (to prevent directors from breachin their duties)
Relief from liability:
- Prior approval by directors
- Prior approval by shareholders
- Ratification
- Relief granted by court (where director has acted honestly, reasonable and ought fairly to be excused)
 
 

Classes of Shares

Ordinary
Most common & default

Carry right to vote, receive dividend and share of capital on winding up
Preference
Entitled to have dividends paid at predet­ermined rate in priority to dividend paid on ordinary shares

Right to priority over ordinary shareh­olders when capital returned on winding up

Don't always have voting rights
Cumulative preference
Arrears of preference dividends not declared in earlier years + those for current year payable before any dividend paid to ordinary shareh­olders
Non-cu­mul­ative preference
Only current year's right to dividend is payable before any dividend paid to ordinary shareh­olders
Partic­ipating preference
Receive both fixed prefer­ential dividend or fraction of capital on winding up + fraction of general dividend or capital in accordance with their shareh­olding
Non-pa­rti­cip­ating preference
Receive only fixed prefer­ential dividend or fraction of capital
Deferred
Only have right to dividend and/or return of capital after claims of preference and ordinary

Not common
Redeemable
Temporary shares which may be bought back by company at future date

Purchased and issues for short-term invest­ments
Non-voting
Issued where company seeks to restrict control of company
Conver­tible
May be converted to a different type of share in issuing company according to pre-ar­ranged formula in articles
Employees'
Issued to employees under employee's share scheme which has tax advantages

Usually issued as ordinary but with restri­ctions

Class Rights & Variations

Presum­ption that all shares have equal rights unless express provision in articles says otherwise
Class rights can only be varied:
- in accordance with relevant provisions in articles; or
- if no provision exists, where 75% of shares of the affected class consent in writing, or a special resolution is passed at meeting of holder of the affected class
Companies may entrench class rights in articles
This protection cannot be circum­vented
Variations which affect the exercise of rights rather than rights themselves are not subject to these provisions (e.g. if company issues more of that same class, even though it may dilute)
Dissenting members of class of shares have right to challenge variation

Only shareh­older holding 15% or more of issued shares of that class may challenge; and
Variation must be challenged in court within 21 days of date which consent was given or resolution was passed to vary class rights

Shareh­olders Reserve Powers

Shareh­older may direct directors to take, or refrain from taking, specified action by special resolution
No such special resolution invali­dates anything which directors have done before passing of resolution
Shareh­olders may act where board is unable to do so

Protection for Shareh­olders

Limit on company's authorised share capital
Articles may limit amount of share capital company may issue, though relatively rare, to protect shareh­olders from dilution
Limit on power of directors to issue new shares
Directors require author­isation of shareh­olders to issue shares in most cases
Pre-em­ption rights
Rights of first refusal when company issues new shares

Rights apply where shares to be issued are 'ordinary shares'

May be disapplied by special resolu­tion, but uncommon

Generally no right on transfer of shares
Class rights
Shares issued with various different rights

Minority Shareh­olders: Unfair Prejudice

Member may apply to court by petition for an order on ground that:
a) Company's affairs are being or have been conducted in a manner which is unfairly prejud­icial to interests of its members generally or of some part of members (incl. himself), or
b) any actual­/pr­oposed act/om­ission of company is or would be so prejud­icial
Complaint must:
Relate to how the affairs of the company have been managed
Petitioner must prove:
- Their interests in their capacity as a member have been unfairly prejudiced as a result of conduct on the part of company
E.g. members have interest in value of shares so could bring a claim if they can show value of shareh­olding has been seriously jeopar­dised by conduct of persons with de facto control

- Breach of contract (articles or shareh­olders' agreement) or breach of some fundam­ental unders­tanding
Examples of unfairly prejud­icial conduct:
- Exclusion from management
- Misman­agement (but not poor management)
- Breach of directors' fiduciary duties
- Excessive remune­ration and refusal to pay dividends
Who may bring a claim?
Any member of the company
Remedies:
- Court may make such order as it thinks fit for giving relief
- Presum­ption that court will grant order for purchase of petiti­oner's shares by company or anotehr shareh­older (most common remedy)

Minority Shareh­olders: Personal Claims

Individual shareh­older may bring claim to recover loss suffered under general principles of contract or tort law
Shareh­older cannot bring personal claim where only loss alleged to have been suffered by shareh­older is a reflection of loss sustained by company (e.g. shares decreasing in value due to wrong suffered by company)
Shareh­older can bring personal claim where D's conduct consti­tuted a breach of legal duty to them personally and that breach caused them personal loss, separate and distinct from loss sustained by company

Financial Assistance

Company may provide financial assistance for purchase of its own shares
Prohib­itions apply to PUBLIC companies:
1. Public companies and their private subsid­iaries prohibited from providing financial assistance for purchase of shares in the public company

2. Public companies prohibited from providing financial assistance for the purchase of shares in their private holding companies
Conseq­uences of unlawful assist­ance:
- Transa­ction will be void

- Company and any officer in default will be liable to a fine and/or up to 2 years in prison
Exceptions (difficult to rely on):
- Financial assistance offered for procedures authorised in other parts of CA 2006 (e.g. redemption of shares­/re­duction of capital)

- Will not be unlawful if company has net assets and (a) those assets are not reduced by giving of financial assist­ance, or (b) where assets are reduced, the assistance is provided out of distri­butable profits

- Assistance not prohibited if purpose of assistance is not for acquis­ition or shares, or is incidental to some larger purpose, or is given in good faith in interest of company
Example of exception:
Financial assistance by company for purposes of employee share scheme made in good faith in interest of company or holding company

Private v Public Company - the basics

Name
Limite­d/Ltd
Plc
Share capital
No requir­ement
Must have share capital with nominal value of at least £50,000, of which 1/4 must be paid up
Directors
Min. 1
Min. 2
Secretary
Optional
Mandatory - person appointed must have requisite knowledge & experience and hold qualif­ication
AGM
Not required
1 per year
Regula­tions
CA 2006
Higher level of regula­tion: CA 2006 + further legisl­ation

Memorandum

Under CA 1985:
Forms part of consti­tution with objects clause
Under CA 2006:
Required to register at CH
Unrestricted objects

Articles

Types/­choices
Model Articles (MA)
Amended MA
Tailor Made Articles
Amendments
Special Resolution
Must be made bona fide in the interests of the company as a whole
Right to demand poll vote cannot be removed in Articles
Legal effect
Binding on the company and its members
Articles = contract between company and members in their capacity as members, regarding their rights and obliga­tions as members
Court has no jurisd­iction to rectify articles
Court will not interfere to rewrite article even while outcome is improbably if article is clear, unambi­guous and not commer­cially absurd
Any member has right to enforce terms of articles against the company
Company is entitled to enforce and restrain breaches of articles against its members

Board Meetings (BM)

Taken by majority vote on a show of hands
In the event of deadlock, chairman has casting vote
Quorum must never be less than 2
Unless otherwise decided, quorum is 2
Directors may instead make decisions by unanimous agreement without holding BM - can indicate this by any means (in practice, rare)
In companies with 1 director, that director can take decisions on their own
Reasonable notice of BM is necessary

Calling a GM

1. BM held at reasonable notice to convene GM
2. Board to give 14 clear days' notice of GM (for Ltd companies)
3. GM - members vote on resolution set out in notice
4. Further BM held at reasonable notice to authorise relevant action and instruct post-m­eeting matters (PMM)
5. PMM - carried out by secretary (or director if no secretary) - copies of relevant documents filled at CH within 15 days of being passed and internal records updated
All special resolu­tions must be filed and some ordinary.
If procedure is not followed, resolution may be invalid. May also be criminal sanctions.

Short-­notice GMs

1. Must be agreed to by majority in number of members who together hold shares of 90% or more of total shares giving rights to attend & vote at GM (% may be increased up to 95% in Articles)
2. BM held at reasonable notice to approve notice of GM and consent to short notice
3. GM - Shareh­olders vote on resolution set out in notice
4. Reconvene BM - Directors authorise relevant action and PMM
5. PMM carried out and copies of relevant documents filed at CH within 15 days of being passed and internal records updated
All special resolu­tions must be filed and some ordinary.
If procedure is not followed, resolution may be invalid. May also be criminal sanctions.

GM Called by Shareh­olders

Shareh­olders holding no less than 5% of paid-up share capital can serve S 303 request on Board to call GM
Upon receipt of S 303, directors must call GM within 21 days
GM must be held on a date within 28 days after date of notice convening GM
If directors fail to call GM, all shareh­olders who submitted S 303 (or any of them repres­enting more than 1/2 of voting rights) can call the GM themselves
If shareh­olders call GM themse­lves, must be held within 3 months of date directors received initial S 303
If shareh­olders call GM themse­lves, they can recover reasonable expenses for doing so from company; company can then recover monies back from directors

Annual General Meeting

Public companies must hold AGM
AGM must be called by directors
AGM must be held on 21 clear days' notice** within 6 months of financial year end
At AGM:
- Directors present annual report
- Shareh­older with voting rights vote on current issues
**Note: day notice is given & day of meeting are discounted in calcul­ating clear days

Types of Director

Executive
Appointed to Exec office
Officer & employee
Works on business
Non-ex­ecutive
Officer but not employee
Not involved in daily running
Provide indepe­ndent guidance & advice to board
Protect shareh­older interests
Alternate
Attends board meetings and acts in director's place if actual director is incapa­cit­ated, otherwise engaged or out of the country
Usually a fellow director or someone approved by board
Quite rare now
Shadow
Does not claim or purport to act as a director
Not held out as director by company
A person in accordance with whose direct­ion­s/i­nst­ruc­tions directors are accustomed to act
Exerts influence over board
De facto
Assumes to act as director but has not been validly appointed
Not a de jure (legal) director
Held out as director
Performs acts which are direct­orial in nature
Part of corporate governance of company
De jure
Director validly appointed at law
Nominee
Director appointed by shareh­older

Appoin­tment of Directors

Governed by Articles
MA: ordinary resolution of shareh­olders; or decision of directors
All persons appointed as directors must consent to act as such
Consent required on form AP01 which must be sent to CH
Register of directors must be kept at company's registered office

Director Service Contracts

Service contracts
For executive directors who are employees
Contain T&Cs of employment
Terms included are for the board to decide
Requires approval by board resolution
Long-term service contracts
Where employment has 'guara­nteed term' which is, or may be, over 2 years
Requires ordinary shareh­older approval
If shareh­older approval not given, term is void and contract can be terminated at any time by giving reasonable notice
No automatic entitl­ement for directors to be paid for their services
Company must keep copy of all directors’ service contracts or memoranda of the terms of these contracts
Shareh­olders have right to inspect copies of service contra­cts­/me­mor­anda, must be provided within 7 days of request

Substa­ntial Property Transa­ctions

Acquis­ition or disposal by direct­or/­con­nected person of a substa­ntial non-cash asset requires ordinary shareh­older approval
Substa­ntial asset =
- exceeds 10% of company's asset value and is more than £5,000; or
- exceeds £100,000
Connected persons =
- members of directors family (spous­e/civil partner, parents, children/step-children);
- companies in which directors or others connected hold over 20% shares;
- business partner or director or persons connected;
- trustees of a trust the benefi­ciaries of which include director or persons connected
Shareh­older may approve transa­ction after the event but this does not absolve directors of potential liability
No shareh­older approval?
- Transa­ction may be voidable;
- Directors involved liable to account for profits and indemnify for loss

Loans to Directors

Loans to directors may be subject to requir­ement of ordinary shareh­older approval
Shareh­olders must be provided with inform­ation as to:
- the nature of the transaction;
- the amount & purpose of loan
- the company's liability in form of memorandum
Shareh­olders may approve transa­ction after the event but this does not absolve directors of potential liability
Shareh­older approval not needed for:
- expend­iture on company business up to £50,000;
- loans for defending procee­dings brought against director;
- loans for defending regulatory actions/investigations;
- loans up to £10,000
- intra-­group transactions;
- money lending companies (where loan made in ordinary course of company business)
If shareh­older approval not obtained and no exceptions apply:
- transa­ction may be voidable
- directors involved liable to account for any profits made and indemnify company for any losses

Payment for Loss of Office

Payment for loss of office to director must be approved by ordinary shareh­older resolution
Exceptions:
- If payment is less than £200;
- Where payment made in good faith (a) in discharge of existing legal obliga­tion, (b) by way of damages for breach of such obliga­tion, (c) by way of settle­men­t/c­omp­romise of any claim arising out of termin­ation, or (d) by way of pension for past services
If shareh­older approval not obtained, director holds payment on trust for company and any director who authorised payment is jointly & severally liable to company for any resulting loss

Shareh­olders Agreements

A contract entered into between shareh­olders which supple­ments the articles
Can be entered into at any time
Can be between certain classes of shareh­olders only, but usually entered into by all shareh­olders
Can only be altered if all shareh­olders agree
Provisions may also be enforc­eable by injunction
Company may also be a party but not to any provisions which would fetter statutory powers of company
An effective way of limiting the possib­ility of major changes within company and protecting interests of minority shareh­olders
Generally provide for how shareh­olders will vote on partic­ularly important decisions
New shareh­olders may be required to join an existing agreement by executing a Deed of Adherence

Minority Shareh­olders: Derivative Claims

A claim brought by a member in respect of a cause of action vested in the company seeking relief on behalf of the company
Who may bring a claim?
Any shareh­older
Who may a claim be brought against?
Any director and/or another person, including former directors
Grounds for bringing a claim:
Any act or omission, actual or proposed, involving neglig­ence, default, breach of duty or breach of trust by director

It is immaterial whether cause of action arose before or after C became a shareh­older
Advant­ages:
Allow individual members to 'right a wrong' on behalf of the company
Disadv­ant­ages:
Relief gained is only awarded to company, not individual member bringing procee­dings
Two-stage applic­ation process:
1. Court will consider whether applicant has prima facie case for permission to continue derivative claim (i.e. good cause of action);

2. If 1 is satisfied, full permission hearing proceeds - court may order company and applicant to provide evidence
Stage 2 - Absolute bars:
Permission must be refused if court is satisfied that:
- person acting to promote success of company would not seek to continue claim, or
- the relevant act/om­ission is yet to occur and has been authorised by company, or
- the relevant act/om­ission has already occurred and was authorised before/has been ratified since
Stage 2 - Discre­tionary bars:
To continue derivative claim, courts must consider:
- Whether member is acting in good faith in seeking to continue claim;
- importance that a person acting to promote success of company would attach to continuing claim;
- whether act/om­ission yet to occur could be authorised before it occurs or ratified after;
- whether act/om­ission that has already occurred could be ratified;
- whether act/om­ission gives rise to another cause for action that member could pursue in own right rather than on behalf of company
Court will dismiss derivative claim unless:
Act is ultra vires or illegal
Personal and individual rights of member have been infringed
There has been fraud on the minority
There has been non-co­mpl­iance with special procedure
Costs:
Member brings the claim but company benefits from remedies
Court may order company to indemnify C against liability in respect of costs incurred in claim/­per­mission application/both
C may apply for costs at same time as permission applic­ation - pre-em­ptive costs order
Court will be reluctant to grant permission to continue derivative claim is unfair prejudice claim available

Statutory Minority Shareh­older Rights

Principal statutory remedies:
Unfair prejudice & just and equitable winding up
Protection against alteration to company's consti­tution
Special resolution of 75% or more required to make changes to articles
Right to requis­ition GM
Shareh­olders holding not less than 5% of voting paid-up capital can request directors to call GM
Right to demand poll vote
Members holding no less than 10% of voting rights; OR not less than 5 members with right to vote; OR members holding cumulative shares with right to vote equalling 10% may demand a poll vote

Mainte­nance of Share Capital

Company must not reduce its share capital except in certain limited circum­stances
Impact on granting of divide­nds­/di­str­ibu­tions:
Company may only pay dividends out of distri­butable profits

Share premium account cannot be used to fund distribution

Most recent annual accounts, or in some cases specially prepared interim accounts, must be referred to to justify dividend payment

Any transa­ction in which a shareh­older receives value will be a distri­bution; disguising distri­butions is in breach of capital maintenance

Directors who authorise unlawful distri­bution and shareh­olders who receive it may be liable

Board must take steps before issuing divide­nd/­dis­tri­bution
Impact on reduction of share capital:
Public and private companies may reduce capital by using court procedure

Requires special shareh­older resolu­tion, then order of court

Creditors have right to object before court order

If succes­sful, reduction will take effect on regist­ration of court order and statement of capital at CH

Private companies may instead use solvency statement of directors and special shareh­older resolution to reduce share capital
Solvency statement must be made not more than 15 days before date on which special resolution passed, must be signed by all directors and must confirm there are no ground on which company could be unable to pay debts, and company will be able to pay debts for 1 year from date of solvency statement

Requirements for private companies purchasing own shares using capital
Impact on purchase and redemption of own shares:
Companies are able to issue shares that are redeemable at option of either company/shareholder
Public company needs express author­isation in articles to issue redeemable shares; Private needs statutory author­isation to issue

Companies are able to purchase their own shares (subject to articles)

For redeemable shares to be issued, must be at least 1 other class of shares in issue

Shares may not be redeemed unless fully paid

Redemption will usually be out of distri­butable profits

Any company may purchase its own shares subject to articles

Must contract with shareh­older selling shares; must be approved by ordinary shareh­older resolution

Requirements for private companies purchasing own shares using capital

Debt Finance - Loan Facilities

An agreement between a borrower and lender giving borrower the right to borrow money on terms set out in agreement
Overdraft:
- On-demand facility
- Bank can call for all of money owed at any point and demand it is repaid immediately
- Unsuitable as long-term borrowing facility
Term loan:
- Loan of money for fixed period, repayable on certain date
- Lender cannot demand early repayment unless borrower is in breach
- Lender will receive interest on loan throughout the period
Revolving credit facility (RCF):
- Borrower has flexib­ility to borrow and repay
- Allows company to draw down money, repay it, then re-draw it down again, then repay it
- Borrower has flexib­ility to choose when it borrows and repays as against a maximum aggregate amount of capital provided by lender

Insolvency - Informal - Pre-In­sol­vency Moratorium

A moratorium is a period during which:
- Creditors are unable to take action to enforce their debts;
-Any existing court procee­dings are stayed; and
- Company may not be wound up
Gives company breathing space:
Lasts for 20 business days but can be extended by directors for further 20 business days

Further extensions are possible up to 1 year
Moratorium automa­tically comes to an end when company enters formal insolvency procedure
Procedure to obtain:
1. Directors must apply to court

2. Applic­ation must be accomp­anied by:
- Statement that company is, or is likely to become, unable to pay debts as they fall due; and
- Statement from licensed insolvency practi­tioner (Monitor) stating that company is eligible and moratorium will likely result in rescue

3. Comes into force at time documents are filed at court

4. Monitor has respon­sib­ility to notify registrar of companies and all creditors of company that moratorium is in force

5. Monitor has superv­isory function during moratorium

Company Facing Financial Diffic­ulties

The directors must review the financial perfor­mance of company and recognise when it is facing financial diffic­ulties
Faced with financial difficulty directors can...
Do nothing:
Directors risk person liability and risk breaching directors' duties
Apply for pre-in­sol­vency morato­rium:
Gives company some 'breathing space'
Do a deal:
Reach inform­al/­formal agreement with creditors with view to resche­duling debts
Appoint admini­str­ator:
Collective formal insolvency procedure consid­ering interests of all creditors aiming to rescue company
Put company into liquid­ation:
Collective insolvency procedure under which business is wound up and assets transf­erred to creditors and, where surplus, to members

Regist­ration of Charges

Must be registered at CH within 21 days beginning with the day after the date of creation of the charge
Any person interested in charge may complete regist­ration formal­ities
Usually done by lender, since lender is most at risk if charge not registered
If charge not registered within 21 days, charge is void against liquid­ator, admini­strator or creditor and debt becomes immedi­ately payable

Any holder of the charge reduced to unsecured creditor
Court has power to extend period of regist­ration where:
- failure to deliver documents was accidental or due to inadve­rtence or to some other sufficient cause, or
- failure to deliver is not of a nature to prejudice the position of creditors or shareh­olders of company, or
- on other grounds, it is just and equitable to grant relief
Certified copies of all charges must be kept at company's registered office

Order of Priority on Winding Up

Guarantees

Guarantees are not a security as they do not give rights in assets
An agreement that the guarantor will pay borrower's debt if borrower fails to do so
Can come from companies or indivi­duals (such as directors)

Fixed and Floating Charges

Fixed charge
Prevents borrower from dealing with assets subject to charge

Lender will control borrower's use of charged asset

Strongest form of security
Floating charge
Does not prevent borrower from dealing with assets unless and until crystallisation
Charge floats over class of asset which fluctuates
Fixed or floating?
Book debts are a fluctu­ating asset and will be treated as a floating charge, unless they are paid into a blocked account which gives the lender the degree of control required for a fixed charge
Crysta­lli­sation: When a floating charge crysta­llises, it ceases to float over all of the assets in a class and fixes onto the assets in the class charged at the time of crysta­lli­sation.

Debt Finance - Security

Temporary ownership, possession or other propri­etary interest in an asset to ensure that debt owed is repaid (i.e. collateral for debt)
Protects creditor in event that borrower enters formal insolvency procedure
Pledge
Security provider gives possession of asset to creditor until debt is paid back
Lien
Creditor retains possession of asset until debt is paid back
Mortgage
Security provider retains possession of asset but transfers ownership to creditor

Subject to security provider's right to require creditor to transfer asset back when debt is repaid

This right is known as the 'equity of redemp­tion'
Charge
Security provider retains possession of asset and equitable propri­etary interest is created in favour of creditor

As well as interest, charging document will give lender certain contra­ctual rights over asset if debt not paid back when it should be

Two type of charge: fixed & floating

Debt Finance - Key Terms

Debenture
1. Covers any form of debt security issued over company, including debenture stock, bonds or others, whether or not consti­tuting charge on assets of company

2. Name of particular document which creates a security by setting out details of security
Repres­ent­ations
Statements of fact as to legal and commercial matters

Made on signing of loan agreement and repeated period­ically during life of loan
Undert­akings
Promises to do/not do something, or to procure that something is done/not done

Known as covenants
Event of default
Breach of repres­ent­ations or undert­akings gives bank contra­ctual remedies where breach consti­tutes event of default

Events of default clause vital in giving bank power to call in its money early if borrower shows signs of becoming enhanced credit risk

Debt Finance Documents

Term sheet
Statement of key terms of transa­ction agreed by lender and borrower

Not intended to be legally binding, but statement of unders­tanding
Loan agreement
Sets out main commercial terms of loan

Includes inform­ation from term sheet in much more detail
Security document
If loan is secured, separate security document will be negotiated and entered into

Debt Finance - Debt Securities

In return for finance provided by investor, company issues security acknow­ledging investor's rights
Security = piece of paper acknow­ledging the debt, which can be kept or sold onto another investor
At maturity date of security, company pays value of security back to holder
Example: a bond
- Issuer (company) promises to pay value of bond to holder of that bond at maturity
- Company also pays interest at particular periods, usually biannually
- Bonds are issued with view to being traded
- Market on which bonds may be traded known as capital market
- Whoever holds bond at maturity will receive value of bond back from issuer
- Private companies can only issue bonds to targeted investors and not public indisc­rim­inately

Company Voluntary Arrang­ement (CVA)

A compromise between company and creditors
Creditors agree to part payment of debts or to new timetable for repayment
Agreement must be reported to court, but no requir­ement for court to approve agreement
CVA supervised and implem­ented by Insolvency Practi­tioner
Company's directors remain in post, involved in implem­ent­ation of CVA
Can be used together with admini­str­ati­on/­liq­uid­ation
Setting up CVA:
1. Directors draft written proposals and appoint nominee
If company in liquid­ati­on/­adm­ini­str­ation, admini­str­ato­r/l­iqu­idator drafts

2. Directors submit proposals and statement of company's affairs to nominee

3. Nominee considers proposals and must report to court within 28 days on whether to call a meeting of company and creditors

4. Nominee gives 14 days' notice of meeting to creditors
Meeting of members must take place within 5 days of creditors' decision

5. Proposals must be approved by 75% in value of creditors (excl. secured creditors) and simple majority of members

6. Nominee reports to court on approval

7. Nominee becomes supervisor and implements proposals
Effect of CVA:
Binding on all unsecured creditors, including those who did not vote or voted against it

Secured/preferential creditors not bound unless they unanim­ously consent
CVAs relatively rarely used

Restru­cturing Plan

Compromise company's creditors and shareh­olders and restru­cture liabil­ities so company can return to solvency
Can bind secured creditors
Can only be used by companies which have/are likely to encounter financial diffic­ulties
Creditors and members must be divided into classes; each class which votes on Plan must be asked to approve it
Must be approved by at least 75% in value of each class voting
Court must sanction Plan and it will then bind all creditors
Who can apply to court for Plan?
- Company
- Any creditor
- Any member
- Liquidator (if in liquidation)
- Admini­strator (if in admini­str­ation)
Court can sanction Plan if just and equitable even if:
- One or more classes do not vote to approve it
- It brings about cross class cramdown
- It brings about a cramdown of shareh­olders
Plan is likely to be used by directors following pre-in­sol­vency moratorium

Wrongful Trading

Establ­ishes liability for directors who carry on business neglig­ently rather than fraudu­lently
Who may bring a claim?
- Liquidator;
- Admini­str­ator; or
- Third Party (assigned by either above)
Against whom?
- Any person who was director at relevant time (including shadow, de facto & non-ex­ecu­tive)
No criminal provisions
When directors become aware, or ought to become aware than insolvent liquid­ati­on/­adm­ini­str­ation is inevit­able, they are under duty to take every step possible to minimise potential losses to creditors
If director fails this duty, court can order director to contribute to insolvent estate by compen­sation for losses that body of creditors have suffered from wrongful condct
Liability imposes personal liability on directors
No requir­ement to show intent or dishonesty
If company has not reached point of no return, wrongful trading liability can not arise; no need to consider 'every step' defence
Examples of 'every step':
- Voicing concerns at regular BMs;
- Seeking indepe­ndent financial & legal advice;
- Ensuring adequate, current financial info available;
- Suggesting reductions in overheads/liabilities;
- Not incurring further credit
Burden of proof?
- On director to establish they took every step
Reasonably diligent person:
- Facts which director ought to have known/­asc­ert­ained, conclu­sions they ought to have reached and steps ought to have taken are those which would have been known/­asc­ert­ain­ed/­rea­che­d/taken by reasonably diligent person with general knowledge, skill and experience expected (objec­tive) and actual knowledge, skill and experience of the relevant director (subje­ctive)
Relief?
Not available
'Insol­vency' restricted to balance sheet test

Fraudulent Trading

Except­ionally high bar for fraudulent trading
Who may bring a claim?
- Liquid­ator; or
- Admini­strator
Against whom?
- Any person knowingly party to carrying on of any business of company with intent to defraud creditors or for any fraudulent purpose
Actual dishon­esty:
- Must be proven for claim to succeed
- Assessed on subjective not objective basis
- Knowledge includes suspicion of relevant facts together with deliberate decision to avoid confirming they did exist
- Not necessary to show all creditors have been defrauded
Remedies:
- Civil liability to contribute to funds available to body of unsecured creditors suffering loss caused by the fraudulent trading;
- Also corres­ponding criminal claim for fraudulent trading (may be brought by same people but court approval required);
- Contribute to company's assets as court thinks proper
- Court likely to make disqua­lif­ication order against person if director

Misfea­sance

On a winding up, action may be brought against directors for any breaches of duty committed by them
Who can bring claim?
- Liquidator (but not administrator);
- Official Receiver; or
- Any credit­or/­con­tri­butory
Burden of proof?
On C to establish misfea­sance on part of director or other D
Not for D to justify their conduct
Against whom?
- Any person who is/was officer of company (incl presen­t/f­ormer directors, managers or secretaries);
- Any others who acted in promotion, formation of management of company; and
- A liquidator or admini­str­ative receiver (or admini­strator under Schedule B1)
What amounts to misfea­sance?
1. Misapp­lic­ation of money/­assets of company;
2. Breach of statutory provis­ion­/duty (E.g. unlawful loans to director; director acting ultra vires; failing to seek approval for substa­ntial property transaction);
3. Directors respon­sible for transa­ctions at an underv­alue, or prefer­ences, may thereby commit a misfea­sance; and
4. Breach of duty to exercise reasonable care, skill and diligence (negli­gence)
Remedies:
Repayment, restor­ation or contri­bution to company's assets as it thinks just
Director may claim relief where they acted honestly and reasonable and ought fairly to be excused
Finding of misfea­sance may lead to disqua­lif­ication order
Ratifi­cation:
Not possible for shareh­olders to ratify what amounts to breach of directors duties at a time when there is a reasonable prospect that company will go into insolvent liquid­ation or admini­str­ation

Role/Power of Liquidator

Management and fiduciary powers of directors are transf­erred to liquidator
Liquidator must act in good faith, avoid conflicts of interest and not make secret profit
Must be qualified insolvency practi­tioner or Official Receiver (appointed by court in short term)
Acts as officer of court
Principle functions:
- To secure and realise assets of company then distribute to creditors; and
- Take into their custod­y/c­ontrol all company's property
Liquidator may:
- Sell any property;
- Execute deeds and other documents in name of company
- Raise money on security of assets;
- Make/draw bill of exchange or promissory note in name of company
- Appoint agent to do any business for them;
- Commen­ce/­defend court procee­dings in name of company;
- Pay debts and compromise claims
Have duty to preserve company's property and maximise value of assets available for distri­bution
Can avoid certain antecedent transa­ctions to maximise amount of assets available (many of these powers also apply to admini­str­ators)

Creditors' Voluntary Winding Up (CVL)

Commenced by special resolution of shareh­olders but under effective control of creditors who can choose liquidator
Where directors' declar­ation of solvency not made, liquid­ation will be CVL
Shareh­olders may nominate person to be liquidator
Within 14 days of special resolution being passed, directors must ask creditors to either approve nominated liquid­ato­r/put forward their own choice
Creditors' liquidator nomination takes precedence
Directors must draw up statement of company's affairs (assets and liabil­ities) and send to creditors

Conversion of MVL to CVL

If liquidator on MVL consider company unable to pay debts and interest within period stated in directors' declar­ation, they must change MVL to CVL
Must prepare and send statement of company's affairs to creditors
Creditors may nominate person to be liquidator (often insolvency practi­tioner who was appointed to deal with MVL)
CVL takes effect from date of nomination of liquidator

Members' Voluntary Winding Up (MVL)

Members must pass special resolution to place company into MVL
Members must pass ordinary resolution to appoint liquidator
Company must be solvent
Directors required to swear declar­ation of solvency stating:
- They have made full enquiry into company's affairs
- They have formed opinion that company will be able to pay creditors in full, with interest at official rate, within period of no more than 1 year from commen­cement of winding up
- Company's assets and liabil­ities as at latest practi­cable date before making declar­ation
Any director making declar­ation of solvency who does not have reasonable grounds for the opinion liable to fine/i­mpr­iso­nment
If debts are not actually paid in full within specified period, presumed that director did not have reasonable grounds for opinion
Winding up commences when special resolution passed

Common Ground for Compulsory Liquid­ation

Most common ground for winding up petition is company's inability to pay debts
Can be evidenced by:
1. Failure to comply with creditor's statutory demand
- Written demand in prescribed form requiring company to pay specific debt
- Demand can only be used if debt exceeds £750 and is not disputed on substa­ntial grounds
- Company has 21 days to pay debt, failing which creditor has right to petition court to wind up company
2. Creditor sues company, obtains judgment and fails in attempt to execute judgment debt
3. Proof to satisf­action of court that company is unable to pay debts as they fall due
- Cash-flow test (usually satisfied by going through process 1, but not essential)
- Consid­eration of debts falling due in reasonably near future
4. Proof to satisf­action of court that value of company's assets is less than amount of its liabil­ities
- Must consider contingent and prospe­ctive liabil­ities ('balance sheet test')
- Burden of proof on party asserting balanc­e-sheet insolvency

Compulsory Liquid­ation

Court-­based process
Applicant presents winding up petition to court to request winding up order against company
Granted petition by court operates in favour of all creditors and contri­but­ories (members and some former members)
Official Receiver will become liquidator and continue in office until another person is appointed
Official Receiver will notify CH and all known creditors of liquid­ation
Official Receiver has power to summon separate meetings of creditors and contri­but­ories to choose person to become liquidator in their place
Who can apply?
- Creditor
- Company (by shareh­olders where insuff­icient assets to fund voluntary liquidation)
- Directors (by board resolution where insuff­icient funds)
- Administrator
- Admini­str­ative receiver
- Supervisor of CVA
- SoS for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy (on public policy grounds)
Grounds for petition:
- Unable to pay debts
- Just and equitable
- Special resolution passed to be wound up
- Public company that has not issued requisite share capital and over 1 year has passed since regist­ration as plc
- Old public company with meaning of Conseq­uential Provisions Act
- Company does not commence business within year of incorp­oration or suspends business for whole year
Conseq­uences:
- Certain dispos­itions of company's property, transfer of shares and changes to members will be void if made after commen­cement of winding up

Liquid­ati­on/­Winding Up

Most common type of insolvency procedure
Process by which company's business is wound up and assets transf­erred to creditors and (where surplus) to members
Both solvent and insolvent companies may be wound up
Liquid­ators function is to:
1. Realise company's assets for cash
2. Determine identity of company's creditors and amount owed to each, then
3. Pay dividend to creditors on propor­tionate basis relative to size of their determined claims
Creditors of same rank are said to rank 'pari passu'
Liquid­ation not a rescue mechanism; Liquidator has very limited powers to carry on business of company
Usually close business and dismiss employees soon after appoin­tment, and sell assets on piecemeal basis rather than selling anything as a going concern
Common for companies to enter liquid­ation after having been through different insolvency procedure first

Receiv­ership

Individual enforc­ement procedure which benefits only the appointing creditor
Most common type is fixed charge receivers
Fixed charge receivers appointed by holders of fixed charge pursuant to terms of security docume­ntation
Appointed to enforce security and recover debt owing to their appointor (often a bank)
Owe duties primarily and exclus­ively to appointer to act in good faith in course of appoin­tment
Usually have extensive powers set out in security documents and some limited powers under Law of Property Act 1925 (e.g. ability to sell, mortgage and collect rents from property)

Pre-Pa­ckaged Sales in Admini­str­ation

Where business of insolvent company is prepared for sale to selected buyer prior to company's entry into admini­str­ation
Agreed sale carried out by insolvency practi­tioner shortly after their appoin­tment
Pre-pack purchaser will often be one or more of existing owners­/di­rectors of insolvent company
Contro­versial
Requires clear, compre­hensive and timely explan­ations to creditors following pre-pa­ckaged sales

Admini­str­ation

Aims to rescue company which is insolvent if at all possible, or achieve better result for creditors if not
Admini­strator acts in interests of creditors as a whole
Admini­str­ators may be able to rescue company which will continue trading; other companies may proceed into liquid­ation
Admini­str­ators required to perform functions in interests of creditors as a whole and owe duties to court and creditors collec­tively
Appoin­tment - Court procedure:
Court may appoint admini­strator where company is or is likely to become unable to pay its debts on applic­ation of company, directors, or one or more creditors

Appointment may only be made where order is reasonably likely to achieve purpose of admini­str­ation
Appoin­tment - Out of court procedure:
The company, directors, or qualifying floating charge holder (often bank) may appoint administrator

Directors cannot use this procedure where creditor has presented petition for winding up of company; here, director can apply to court or QFCH can use out of court procedure
Directors unable to exercise any management powers without consent of admini­strator
Once appointed, admini­strator has up to 8 weeks to produce report setting out proposals for company's future

Report must be put to all creditors for approval

If reject, company usually put into liquidation

If accepted, admini­strator has options for company to exit admini­str­ation
12-month fixed time limit for completion of admini­str­ations, though possible to obtain extensions
Admini­strator must report outcome to court
Company can benefit from moratorium during admini­str­ation
During admini­str­ation, all documents & website must state company is in admini­str­ation
During admini­str­ation morato­rium, admini­str­ators may sell property subject to floating charge

Prefer­ences

Prevents creditor from obtaining improper advantage over other creditors at time when company is insolvent
Who may bring a claim?
- Liquid­ator; or
- Admini­strator
Company gives preference if:
1. Person is a creditor (or surety­/gu­arantor of any of debts/­lia­bil­ities); and

2. Company does anythi­ng/­allows anything to be done which has effect of putting that person in better position in event of company going into insolvent liquid­ation than they would otherwise have been in
Preference will be voidable if:
1. It was given within relevant time (in 6 months preceding onset of insolv­enc­y)(­rel­evant time extended to 2 years for connected persons)

2. It was proved company was insolvent on cash flow/b­alance sheet basis at time of transa­ction or became so as a result of it

3. It is proved that company was influenced by desire to prefer creditor (subje­ctive test)
If preference given to connected person­/as­soc­iate, there is rebuttable presum­ption that company was influenced by desire to prefer creditor (shifts burden to preferred person to rebut)
Defences:
Absence of desire to prefer (e.g. action was result of genuine commercial pressure to continue trading and avoid defaults)
Sanctions:
Court has discretion to make order to restore position as if company had not given preference

Transa­ctions Defrauding Creditors (TDC)

Claims may be brought by victim of transa­ction in question where company is insolv­ent­/so­lvent
Must have been:
- A TUV; and
- Intent­ion­/pu­rpose of transa­ction putting assets beyond reach of creditors or otherwise prejudice their interests, including future creditors unknown at time of transa­ction.
Insolvency practi­tioners may prefer to bring TUV claim over TDC claim as no burden of proof that purpose was to put assets beyond reach of credit­ors­/pr­ejudice them
Who may claim?
- Liquidator/administrator;
- Supervisor of voluntary arrang­ement; or
- Victim of relevant transa­ction
Sanctions:
Court may make such order as it thinks fit to restore position to what it would have been but for transa­ction
Advantage:
TDC does not face risk of becoming time-b­arred in same way as TUV

Avoidance of Certain Floating Charges

Prevents unsecured creditor obtaining floating charge to secure existing loan for no new consid­eration at expense of other unsecured creditors
Only applies in liquid­ati­on/­adm­ini­str­ation
Automatic procedure; no need for office­-holder to challenge floating charge by bringing legal procee­dings
Legal procee­dings may only be brought where there is a dispute between floating charge holder and office holder over applic­ation of avoiding the charge
For floating charge to be invalid:
1. Must have been created within relevant time (12 months preceding onset of insolv­ency, extended to 2 years for charge granted to connected person)

2. Unless granted to connected person­/as­soc­iate, must be proved that company was insolvent on either cash-f­low­/ba­lance sheet basis at time of floating charge's creation, or became insolvent because of charge creation
When are floating charges valid?
Even if above holds, charge will be valid to extent that 'new money' or fresh consid­eration is provided to the company (or existing debts are exting­uished) in return for grant of charge on/after its creation
Where floating charge is void here, only security (and its advantage to creditor in order of priority) is void, not the debt itself
Floating charge is also void against liquid­ator, admini­strator and other creditors if not duly registered with CH
Floating charge to creditor may also be voidable as TUV or preference

Transa­ctions at an Undervalue (TUV)

TUV =
- A gift; or
- A transa­ction for consid­eration the value of which, in money/­money's worth, is signif­icantly less in value than consid­eration provided by the company
Granting of securi­ty/­payment of dividend may be held to amount to TUV
Court may set aside transa­ction as a TUV if:
1. Company made a gift/e­ntered into transa­ction for consid­eration which was signif­icantly less value than consid­eration provided by company

2. It took place within relevant time (2 years preceding onset of insolvency)

3. It is proved by applicant that company was insolvent at time of transa­ction or became so as a result of it
Where TUV entered into with person connected, insolvency is presumed unless connected person proves otherwise
No order will be made to set aside transa­ction if:
1. Company entered into transa­ction in good faith for purpose of carrying on business; and

2. At the time, there were reasonable grounds for believing transa­ction would benefit company
Sanctions:
- Court has discretion to make such order as it thinks fit to restore position as if company had not entered transa­ction