Show Menu
Cheatography

Land Law Cheat Sheet (DRAFT) by

Land Law Cheat Sheet

This is a draft cheat sheet. It is a work in progress and is not finished yet.

Mortgages: Introd­uction

Mortgagee:
The lender who loans money to fund the property purchase.
Mortgagor:
The borrower who grants rights over the property as a security for the loan.
Mortgage:
A propri­etary right.
 
Must be created by **deed.
 
The deed must be registered at the Land Registry.
Equity of redemption:
The collective rights of the borrower and their ability to which it may challenge mortgage terms.
 
A borrower has an equitable right to redeem the mortgage (i.e. pay it back).
 
Equity will be prepared to declare void any term which tries to postpo­ne/­prevent redemption of the loan.
 
A lender may not use its position to impose terms that would be considered morally repreh­ensible or uncons­cio­nable.
Undue influence:
A borrower has a right to be protected from undue influence.
 
A mortgage loan can be set aside for undue influence.
Priority:
A landowner may grant more than one mortgage over their land.
 
Issues of priority arise where the loan is in default and there is not enough money to pay back all the lenders.
Rights of lender in a default:
1. Right to possess the property; and
 
2. Power to then sell it.
 
A court order should be recomm­ended to a lender unless the mortgaged premises are vacant for right (1).
 
If the mortgaged property is wholly­/partly used as a dwelling and the borrower can show they are able to repay the arrears and continuing payments due, the court is likely to postpone the order for possession.
Lender's duties:
The lender is under duties when exercising its power of sale.
 
E.g. they must sell the property at market value and seek expert advice as to the manner of sale.

Anatomy of a Lease

Parties, date, defini­tions, interp­ret­ation provisions:
Date of the lease.
 
Names and addresses of landlord and tenant.
 
A section giving guidelines on interp­ret­ation and defini­tions.
Demise and rents:
The landlord transfers or grants the lease of the premises to the tenant for a specified term in consid­eration of the rent paid and the covenants entered into.
Tenant covenants:
A tenant may do all things that an owner of an estate can do unless the lease prohibits such actions.
 
The lease sets out what the tenant cannot do by way of a number of tenant covenants.
 
e.g. obligation to pay rent, whether the tenant can make altera­tions; whether tenant can assign­/un­derlet the premises.
 
If there is no mention of an action in a lease, the tenant is free to do it.
Landlord covenants:
If the lease is a lease of part of a building, the landlord may covenant to provide services, maintain common areas and to insure the building.
 
The most common is the covenant for quiet enjoyment (covenant not to interfere with tenant's posses­sio­n/e­njo­yment of property during lease term).
Guaran­tor's covenants:
An indivi­dua­l/c­ompany guarantor may also be a party to the lease.
 
Covenant to guarantee payments that must be made under the lease and the perfor­mance of any other obliga­tions so that if the tenant defaults in payment, the landlord is able to call upon the guarantor.
Provisos, agreements and declar­ations:
Miscel­laneous section dealing with a number of matters.
 
e.g. forfeiture clauses, exclusion of security of tenure.
Rights granted:
Any easements over the property or parts of the building.
Rights excepted and reserved:
The landlord's reserved rights to access the premises, or run cables through it or carry out repairs, for example.
 
Rent review provisions to review rent at regular intervals.
 
Service charge provisions to cover costs for mainte­nance and repairs where the property is one part of a whole.
Prescribed lease clauses:
Where you are granting a regist­rable lease, your lease must include a list of Prescribed Lease Clauses at the front.
 
Main areas of focus = date of lease; landlord's title number; parties; term; easements granted & reserved.

Business Leases: Security of Tenure

Security of tenure:
A business may request a new tenancy at the end of their lease.
 
The landlord's ability to recover the premises from the tenant is limited.
............Advantages...........
For the tenant:
Can treat the premises as a lon-term prospect.
 
Can invest in fitting out the premises and making them suitable for their purposes.
 
Retail­/re­sta­urant business can reap the benefits of goodwill from their location, i.e. repeat customers.
 
Do not have to worry about consid­erable upheaval caused by having to move at the end of contra­ctual term.
For the landlord:
Premises is more appealing to prospe­ctive tenants.
 
Tenant is encouraged to look after the premises.
 
Market rent may be higher for a lease enjoying security of tenure.
............Disadv­antages...........
For the landlord:
Limits to the landlord's freedom.
 
Complying with requir­ements can be quite compli­cated.
............Applic­ation of Security of Tenure...........
Any tenancy:
Fixed term or periodic tenancies can benefit from security of tenure.
 
Licences or tenancies at will cannot benefit from security of tenure.
Occupied by the tenant:
If a tenant leaves the premises vacant, they do not have security of tenure.
 
If the tenant underlets the whole/part of the premises, they cannot be in occupation and will lose security of tenure over the whole/part of the premises accord­ingly.
For the purposes of a business:
For any trade, profession or employment
 
E.g. charity shop, member­s-only tennis club, reside­ntial use that furthers the tenant's business
 
A tenant taking a small amount of lodgers without profit is not for business purposes, nor is a premises offering free Sunday school sessions.
............Excluded Tenancies...........
S 43 Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 specif­ically excludes some types of tenancies from security of tenure:
Agricu­ltural tenancies
 
Mining leases
 
Service tenancies (lease granted as part of a tenant's employ­ment)
 
Fixed term tenancies of 6 months or less (which can become protected if tenant has been in occupation for 1 year or more whether through successive tenancies or if tenancy is renewable beyond 6 months).
............Contracted Out Tenancies...........
S 38A Landlord and Tenant Act 1954:
Parties can agree to exclude a fixed term lease from security of tenure provis­ions.
 
A periodic tenancy that qualifies for security of tenure cannot be contracted out.
 
Short term leases (5 years or less) and underl­eases are commonly contracted out.
............Procedure for Contra­cting Out...........
The two-stage procedure must be strictly observed.
Stage 1:
The landlord must serve a warning notice on the tenant in a prescribed form.
 
This should detail the conseq­uences of contra­cting out.
 
It must be served before the parties complete the lease.
Stage 2:
The tenant must provide a declar­ation in prescribed form to the landlord.
 
It must be provided before the parties complete the lease.
 
If lease completion is 14+ days from the date of warning notice, this can be a simple signed declar­ation.
 
If lease completion is >14 days, the tenant must provide a statutory declar­ation (declared before an indepe­ndent solici­tor).
The resulting lease must contain reference to both the notice and declar­ation of contra­cting out.

Leases: Types of Covenant

Absolute:
'The Tenant shall not do [ ]'
 
The tenant is completely prohibited from doing something.
Qualified:
'The Tenant shall not do [ ] without the Landlord’s consent'
 
The tenant can go and ask the landlord for its consent although the landlord does not have to give it.
Fully qualified:
'The Tenant shall not do [ ] without the Landlord’s consent such consent not to be unreas­onably withheld or delayed'
 
The landlord has to be reasonable if it is going to withhold its consent.
 
Landlord is not entitled to refuse its consent on grounds which have nothing to do with the landlord and tenant relati­onship.
 
Must be something to do with, for example, the proposed assignee’s ability to pay the rent or bad references.
Note: Statutes relating to user, altera­tions and alienation covenants intervene with regards to qualified covenants.

Leases: Repair Covenants

The tenant must keep the premises in the condition in which they would be kept by a reasonably minded owner, having regard to:
- the character & type of premises at the beginning of the lease.
- the age of the premises.
- the express words of the covenant.
..............................................................................
The tenant must put the premises in repair first, if at the time of the letting they were out of repair.
- this can be very onerous.
A repair obligation can be limited by a schedule of condition
..............................................................................
if the works constitute 'renewal' rather than 'repair', they will not fall within the tenant’s repair obliga­tion.
Repair = restor­ation by renewal or replac­ement of subsidiary parts.
Renewal = recons­tru­ction of the entirety of the premises.
If the cost of undert­aking works is only slightly less than the value of the premises, it will not fall within a repair covenant.

Leases: Alteration Covenants

The tenant is free to carry out any altera­tions to the premises unless the lease stipulates otherwise.
This is subject to the legal doctrine of waste which prevents altera­tions which would devalue the premises.
............................................................................
If there is a qualified covenant against alteration that improve the premises, S 19(2) LTA implies a proviso that the landlord's consent is not to be unreas­onably withheld.
S 19(2) converts a qualified covenant against improv­ement altera­tions into a fully qualified one.
Improv­ements = works that improve the premises from the tenant's perspe­ctive.
............................................................................
As a condition for giving consent, the landlord can ask for:
- payment of compen­sation for loss in value caused by the altera­tions;
- reinst­atement of the premises at the end of the lease if reason­able;
- payment of the landlord's expenses in giving consent.

Leases: User Covenants

A landlord will want control over the tenant's use of the premises.
A tenant may be able to change the use of the premises depending upon the type of covenant.
............................................................................
S 19(3) LTA prevents a landlord demanding payment for granting its consent to qualified user covenants.
The landlord can demand payment if the change of use involves a change to the structure.
If the change involves structure, the landlord can increase the rent or charge the tenant a lump sum in return for consent.
The landlord's consent for qualified user covenants need not be reason­able.
The landlord can recover its costs and expenses in the applic­ation for consent.

Leases: Alienation Covenants

............Assigning a Lease...........
If the lease is silent as to assign­ment, then the benefit of a lease is freely assignable.
Most leases contain restri­ctions on assignment so that the landlord has to consent and has control over who ends up being the tenant.
A covenant against assignment does not prohibit subletting of the whole or part.
A covenant against sub-le­tting the whole does not prohibit a subletting of part.
Formal­ities to Transfer the Lease:
Deed:
S 52 LPA 1925 requires a deed.
 
Applies even if the lease has been created with no formal­ities.
 
No short lease exception: the assignment still must be by deed.
 
Land Registry form TR1/TR01 is often used.
Regist­ration:
If the lease is registered at the Land Registry, the deed of assignment must also be registered to update the registered proprietor of the lease as the assignee.
Licence to Assign:
A deed which formally records the landlord's consent.
 
The landlord, tenant & assignee are all party to it.
............Subletting a Lease...........
Sublet­tin­g/s­ubl­eas­ing­/un­der­letting involves a tenant granting a lease out of its own lease.
The tenant would always be respon­sible for performing the covenants in the lease and still be in the picture until the end of the lease term.
Formal­ities to Underlet the Lease:
Deed:
The general rule is that the lease must be granted by deed.
Regist­ration.
The deed must be registered if the term is for over 7 years.
Licence to Underlet:
A deed which formally records the landlord's consent to the underl­etting.
 
The landlord, tenant & undert­enant are all party to it.
............Statutory Interv­entions...........
Absolute covenants:
Where a property is not capable of being sub-di­vided, leases will contain an absolute prohib­ition of underl­etting of part of the property.
 
The landlord may as a 'one-off' waive the prohib­ition against alienation, but it is under no obligation to do so.
Qualified covenants:
S 19(1)(a) converts a qualified covenant into a fully qualified covenant.
Fully qualified covenants:
Consent shall not be unreas­onably held.
 
Not necessary for the landlord to justify conclu­sions for refusing consent, if those conclu­sions might have been reached by a reasonable person in the circum­stances.
 
May be reasonable for the landlord to refuse its consent to an assignment due to the purpose for which the proposed assignee intends to use the premises - even if that purpose is not forbidden by the lease.
 
Where a tenant applies to the landlord in writing for consent (s 1 LTA):
- the landlord must give written consent within a reasonable time (~28 days from receipt);
- the burden is on the landlord to provide reasonable refusal; and
- written reasons must be provided.
 
The landlord is entitled to be given sufficient inform­ation to enable it to make a decision (a reasonable time will not expire before L has this but L must ask for it).
 
If the landlord does not comply with requir­ements, it may be liable for tortious damages for breach of statutory duty.
............Refusal of consent...........
Reasonable:
Unsati­sfa­ctory tenant’s reference.
 
Proposed assignee’s use of the property would damage the landlord’s own commercial interests (if they run a rival business).
 
The existing tenant is already in breach of covenant.
Unreas­onable:
The landlord’s intention was to bring the tenancy to an end so would not consent to any assignee.
 
Proposed assignee was already a tenant of the landlord in another property which is difficult to re-let.
............Pre-Co­ndi­tions for Alienation...........
S 19(1) LTA 1927:
Applies to any lease granted on/after 1 Jan 1996 - new leases.
New leases:
L & T can agree circum­stances in which L may withhold consent to an assignment.
 
L & T can agree conditions* subject to which consent may be granted.
 
These circum­sta­nce­s/c­ond­itions will be automa­tically reasonable if imposed by L when giving consent to assign.
AGA:
Authorised Guarantee Agreement
 
A common condition attached to L's consent.
 
Outgoing T promises to perform incoming assignee's obliga­tions under lease if it defaults*.
 
Any future assignment by the assignee requires a further AGA.
 
L will only ever have the current T and T immedi­ately prior to current T on the hook.

Leases: Covenant Enforc­eab­ility

............Original Parties...........
Privity of contract:
All terms of a lease can be enforced by the original L against the original T and vice versa.
Privity of estate:
Exists between any current L and current T of the property.
 
It lasts only for a period while the lease is vested in T.
Upon assignment of the lease of revers­ionary interest:
- Privity of contract remains between original L and original T.
- There will be no privity of estate between original L & original T.
- Privity of estate exists between the current L and current T.
T assigns its interest to a successor in title:
- No contra­ctual relati­onship between L and new T (assig­nee): privity of estate but no privity of contract.
L sells its revers­ionary interest:
- No contra­ctual relati­onship between the buyer and current T: privity of estate but no privity of contract.
............Rules for Leasehold Covenant Enforc­eab­ility...........
Old leases:
Created before 1 Jan 1996.
Liability of original L & T continues for full duration of the lease term, regardless of assign­men­t/r­eve­rsion.
Privity of contract means original L & T remain liable for breaches of covenants by their successors for entire lease duration.
Privity of estate allows T's covenants that touch & concern the land to be enforc­eable by/against successor L's & T's.
New leases:
Created on/after 1 Jan 1996.
Abolishes privity of contract.
Original L & T are no longer liable for covenants for full duration of the lease term.
Tenants:
A T with a new lease will obtain an automatic release from the T's covenants upon assignment (s 5 LCTA).
 
There is no automatic relief if the assignment is in breach of the alienation covenant.
 
T remains liable for breaches of covenant occurring during their period of occupation.
 
When T assigns a lease, the assignee acquires the benefit and burden of all covenants in the lease.
Landlords:
There is no automatic release of the L upon assignment of the reversion of a new lease.
 
L must apply for such a release from T.
 
If T refuses to release the outgoing L, L can apply to the court.
 
L remains liable for breaches of covenant occurring during their period of occupation.
 
When L assigns the revers­ionary interest, the incoming L acquires the benefit and burden of the covenants.
The benefit and burden of covenants which are personal (i.e. express between 2 named parties in the lease) will not pass to a third party.
............Suing a Former Tenant...........
An assignee of the lease becomes liable for all covenants in the lease from the date of assignment.
Should the assignee be unwill­ing­/unable to comply, L may look to other parties for compen­sation for breaches of covenant committed by a subsequent assignee*.
If the outgoing T has been automa­tically released under the lease on assignment (s 5), T will not be liable.
If the outgoing T has provided an AGA on assign­ment, L could sue the former T who is guaran­teeing obliga­tions of their immediate successor.
............Presence of an AGA...........
The presence of an AGA provides L with a choice:
- L could sue the current T and may be able to obtain an equitable remedy.
- If current T is not worth suing, L can sue the outgoing T acting as a guarantor for current T through AGA. The potential remedy is limited to damages.
- The former T may recoup damages paid on behalf of current defaulting T using an indemnity.
............Indemn­ities for Assign­ments...........
An outgoing T should ensure their assignee enters into an express indemnity covenant on assign­ment.
The assignee agrees with the outgoing T to pay the rent & perform all covenants for the remainder of the lease.
The former T may then sue the assignee for breach of indemnity covenant and recoup damages paid to L.
Where there is no express indemnity covenant, the former T could claim indemnity at common law under Moule v Garrett.
Moule v Garrett can only be used for actions against assignees and not sub-te­nants.
Indemnity is of little value - if the assignee was worth suing, L would have done so initially.
............Subleases...........
S 3(5) LTCA allows restri­ctive covenants in new leases to be enforced against any owner/­occ­upier of the premises.
L's will not be able to directly enforce any positive covenants against a subtenant.

LTCA 1995

Some sections of LTCA apply to old & new leases.
S 17 - Tenant default notice:
Where L wishes to pursue a former T who remains liable for a fixed charge, L must serve notice of the claim on T within 6 months of the charge becoming due.
 
Fixed charge = arrears of rent, service charge or insurance premiums.
 
If L does not notify the former T of the claim and amount due, L cannot make a claim.
S 18 - Liability for variations:
Former tenants and guarantors are not liable to pay any additional amounts owing in respect of unanti­cipated variations made to the lease after the assignment.
S 18 - Overriding leases:
If a former T is called upon by L to pay fixed charges due from an assignee, the former T is entitled to request an overriding lease from L.
 
The former T would then become the immediate L of the defaulting party.
 
The overriding lease is granted for a term equal to the remaining term of the lease + 3 days.
 
The lease contains the same covenants (except for personal ones).
 
If the former T requests an overriding lease, L is obliged to grant it within a reasonable time.

Factors that Defeat a Lease

For a lease to exist, rather than a licence, there needs to be: certain term, exclusive posession, correct formal­ities.
Even where these requir­ements are present, the agreement may still not be a lease.
...............................
The main situations where something which would otherwise be a lease is merely a licence are where there is:
1. No intention to create legal relations:
Where there is a family arrang­ement, an act of friendship or generosity, it can be presumed that there is a lack of such intention, though this does not automa­tically follow.
 
If there is a degree of formality to the agreement and/or a rent is paid then this would evidence an intention to create legal relations.
2. A service occupancy:
This arises where there is an employ­er/­emp­loyee relati­onship between the landowner and the occupier
 
Where the occupier is required to live in the premises for the better perfor­mance of his duties as an employee, there is no tenancy, even though a rent may be paid.
 
A perk of the job does not enable a better perfor­mance of duties.
 
E.g. careta­ker's flat, gameke­eper's cottage, domestic staff accomm­odation.

Legal Mortgages

A mortgage is capable of being a legal interest in land.
To be recognised as a legal interest, the mortgage must be created in compliance with the formal­ities for a legal interest over registered land.
If the mortgage is being granted over a legal estate by the legal owner, the mortgage is capable of being a legal interest.
If the mortgage is granted by deed and is properly registered, it is a valid legal mortgage.
............Formal­ities...........
Deed + Regist­ration
Deed:
- Must be clear on the face of the document that it is intended to be a deed.
- Must be validly executed.
- Must be delivered.
Regist­ration:
- Must be registered at the Land Registry.
- If not registered, the mortgage will not take affect as a legal mortgage but could still be an equitable interest.
- The grant of a legal charge is required to be completed by regist­ration.

Equitable Mortgages

Mortgages of equitable interests:
Where the borrower holds an equitable interest in the land (e.g. benefi­ciary), any mortgage of that interest will be equitable in nature.
 
Such a mortgage can be created very informally.
 
It need only be in writing and signed by the grantor in order to be validly created.
Defective legal mortgages:
A mortgage over registered land which is not granted by a valid deed or that is not completed by regist­ration will not take effect as a legal mortgage.
 
It may be regarded as an equitable mortgage - a contract to grant a legal mortgage - if it is in writing, contains all agreed terms and is signed by mortgagor & mortgagee.

Discharge of Mortgages

Once a mortgage has been repaid in full, the mortgage entries at the Land Registry must be cancelled.
A mortgage is only fully discharged when all reference to it has been removed from the Charges Register at the Land Registry.
A DS1 form is used to discharge a mortgage over the whole of the land in a title.
A DS3 form is used to discharge a mortgage over part of the land in title (e.g. if only part of the land is being sold).

Mortgages: Equity of Redemption

Equitable of redemption rules =
1. The equitable right to redeem supple­ments the legal right to redeem.
- A mortgage may include an option for the lender to purchase the mortgaged property.
- Such terms may be declared void as preventing the exercise of the equitable right to redeem.
- If the lender has the opport­unity to buy the property, the borrower inevitably loses the right to take the property back free of the loan, which is fundam­ental to the nature of a mortgage as security.
- Whether the right to redeem is rendered valueless is a question of fact and degree.
- If an option is indepe­ndent of the mortgage, it may be upheld.
2. No postpo­­ne­m­e­nt­­/pr­­ev­e­ntion of redemp­­tion.
- Courts look at clauses which postpone the legal date for redemption very closely and will not allow a clause which prevents redemption altoge­ther.
- Courts may allow a lender to postpone the date, but will consider the equitable rule that there must be no clog or fetter on the equity of redemp­tion.
- This is a clog on the equity of redemption.
3. No collateral advantages
- Lenders are entitled only to the repayment of capital advanced plus interest.
- If a lender tries to extract additional value from the borrower, the offending term in the mortgage deed may be struck out as being contrary to the equity of redemp­tion.
4. No uncons­cio­nable terms
- Courts have a well-e­sta­blished inherent equitable jurisd­iction to strike out oppressive and uncons­cio­nable terms.
- The term must be more than simply ‘unfair’ or ‘unrea­son­able’.
- High-i­nterest rates attract the most attention.
- The imposition of a premium is uncons­cio­nable if it wipes out any chance of surplus sale proceeds for the borrower.
- The lender may be justified in charging a higher rate if the borrowers have a poor credit history and are a credit risk.
- Has the term been imposed in a morally repreh­ensible manner?

Mortgages: Undue Influence

....How does the bank ensure there is no undue influence when granting a mortga­ge?....
- Lender must write to the party who is granting the mortgage not for their benefit (Party B).
- Lender must explain to Party B that the Bank needs confir­mation from an indepe­ndent solicitor that that solicitor has explained the transa­ction to them.
- Bank will ask Party B to nominate an indepe­ndent solicitor and provide all inform­ation to that solicitor .
- Bank must not proceed to lend until confir­mation is received from the solicitor that the transa­ction has been fully explained to Party B.
....What role does the indepe­ndent solicitor play?....
- Must meet the party who is entering into the mortgage not for their own benefit (Party B) face to face and on their own.
- Must explain why they are meeting.
- Must explain documents and transa­ction in a meaningful way using non-te­chnical language.
- Must point out the risks, emphasise that Party B has a choice, keep a detailed attendance note and confirm everything in writing.
- The solicitor will then send a certif­icate to the Bank.
.......................................................................
If this is done, the Bank's interest in the land under the mortgage, including the right to possess and sell, has priority over the private indivi­duals' freehold interests.
These steps should be taken in every non-co­mme­rcial case where a private individual offers their property as security for another person's debts.
E.g. parent­/child; brothe­r/s­ister; employ­er/­emp­loyee; friends.

Mortgages: Priority over Registered Land

............L­egal Mortga­ges...........
- Priority between registered charges depends on the order they are entered on the register - S 48 LRA 2002.
- Mortgages over registered land which are not completed by substa­ntive register will not take effect as a legal mortgage - S 27(1) LRA.
............E­qu­itable Mortga­ges...........
- Priority between equitable mortgages depends on the order of creation - S 28 LRA 2002.
- If the equitable mortgage is protected by entry of a notice, it will take priority over later legal mortgages - protection will NOT affect priority over equitable mortgages which is always by creation date.
- An equitable mortgage not protected by notice does not take priority over a later registered estate (transfer of legal estate for value) or registered charge (grant of legal mortgage).

Mortgages: Lender's Rights / Remedies

Debt action:
- This is used in addition to one of the other remedies.
- A personal action against the borrower.
- Negative equity = when the value of the mortgaged property is less than the outsta­nding mortgage debt.
- If the lender sells in negative equity, they will wish to pursue a debt action against the borrower for the shortfall.
- Under a mortgage created by deed, the period for recovery of the debt stated in the deed (the capital) is 12 years*.
- The limitation period for recovery of interest is 6 years.
Possession:
- This is a last resort.
- A prudent lender will make an applic­ation to the court for an order for posses­sion, even though this may not be strictly necessary.
- Lenders should try to discuss the debt with the borrower and accept reasonable requests for a new payment plan.
- Where the property is wholly­/partly reside­ntial S 36 AJA 1970 applies: power to postpone the date for delivery of possession as the court thinks reasonable.
Sale:
- Most mortgage docs contain an express power of sale setting out how/when the power will be exercised.
- Right to sell can be implied under s 101(1)(i) LPA and arises when the mortgage money has become due.
- S 101(1)(i) can be exercised where at least 1 of the below apply:
1. Notice requiring payment of the whole loan served by lender & borrower defaulted.
2. Interest is unpaid with 2 months' arrears of that interest.
3. Borrower has breached another mortgage provision which could affect value of security (i.e. the property).
- Lenders are under a duty to take expert advice as to the method of sale, marketing strategy & reserve price.
- Lender must take reasonable care to obtain true market value for property but is not expected to delay to improve property or wait for upturn in market.
Receiver:
- A receiver acts as a manager of the mortgaged property if the lender does not reposs­ess­/sell.
- Power arises under s 101(1)­(iii) LPA 1925.
- The receiver's function is to get income from the land.
- The receiver is the borrower's agent so a safer option for the lender.
Forecl­osure:
- Rarely used nowadays - draconian remedy.
- Lender takes freehold of the property.
- This is a lengthy and complex procedure for the lender.
- The court may order a sale in lieu of forecl­osure, especially if the property is worth more than the debt.
- Even after declaring forecl­osure, the borrower can re-open the case if they can show they have the means to pay.

Is a Right an Easement?

4 requir­ements to be an easement:
1. To be a legal easement, the right must fall within definition in s 1(2)(a) LPA 1925: grante­d/r­eserved for equivalent of freeho­ld/­lea­sehold estate.
2. Right must be capable of being an easement - re Ellenb­orough Park.
3. Right must not be prevented from being an easement by a disqua­lifying factor.
4. Right must have been acquired as an easement: expressly, impliedly or prescr­iption.

Easements: Requir­ements 1 & 4.

............Legal Easements...........
- An easement grante­d/r­eserved for the equivalent of a term of years absolute is capable of being a legal interest in the land.
- e.g. a right of way granted when part of freehold land is sold will be granted forever.
- e.g. a right of drainage granted in a 5-year lease will be granted for the term of that lease.
............Equitable Easements...........
- An easement not grante­d/r­eserved for the equivalent of a freeho­ld/­lea­sehold.
- e.g. a right to park granted until 'the altern­ative parking facility is complete'.
............Positive Easements...........
- Allow the holder to use the servient land of another in a particular way.
- e.g. a right of drainage allows the holder to use pipes under that land.
............Negative Easements...........
- Prevent the servient land owner from doing something on their land by giving the dominant owner the right to receive something.
- Enjoyed from the dominant owner's land and does not involve enteri­ng/­using the servient land at all.
- e.g. a right to air; a right to light (only in relation to a define aperture); a right to support.
............Grants...........
- A type of easement.
- A landowner sells/­leases part of their land to another and gives them an easement over the land which they have retained.
............Reserv­ations...........
- A type of easement.
- A landowner sells/­leases part of their land to another and retains a right over the land they have sold/l­eased.
............Express creation...........
- Most easements commonly arise when land is sold/l­eased.
- Set out in writing in the transfer deed or lease.
............Implied creation...........
- Easement may be deemed to have been created impliedly so it is effect­ively "­wri­tte­n" into the document from which it was omitted.
............Implied creation...........
- Easements may arise by long use.
- Legal easements created out of easements exercised over land for at least 20 years with no express grant/­res­erv­ation.
- Easement should have been exercised over this time without force, secrecy or express permission.
- Generally can only be claimed by a freeholder. Tenant can only claim if it is right of light.
- No use for 1 year or more = interr­uption to the 20 years.

Easements: Requir­ement 2

Factors which disqualify an easement
1. Exercise of the right must not amount to exclusive possession of the servient tenement:
If an easement causes the servient owner to not be able to use the servient land at all it is clear that there is exclusive possession by the dominant owner.
 
The easement must not leave the servient owner with no reasonable use of the servient tenement - ouster principle.
 
Sole use for a limited purpose retains the servient owner's possession and control, so can still be an easement.
2. Exercise of the right by the dominant owner must not involve additi­ona­l/u­nav­oidable expend­iture by the servient owner:
If there is a positive obligation on the servient tenement to spend extra money to redeem the right, it is not an easement.
3. Exercise of the right must not depend on permission being given by the servient owner:
After the initial grant, express permission should not be required.
 
If the servient owner only exercises their right in so far as they are permitted by the dominant tenement, there is no easement.

Easements: Requir­ement 3

4 essential charac­ter­istics of an easement - Re Ellenb­orough Park
1. There must be a dominant & servient tenement:
2 identi­fiable pieces of land:
- 1 which benefits from the exercise of the right (dominant);
- 1 which is burdened by its exercise (servi­ent).
2. The right must accomm­odate the dominant tenement:
The right must benefit the dominant land, not a person­/bu­siness on the land.
 
The right should affect nature, quality, use or value of dominant land and not be expressly personal.
 
The dominant and servient land must be suffic­iently proximate to each other.
3. There must be diversity of ownership:
The dominant and servient land must be owned by different people.
 
If the dominant and servient land ever came back into common ownership, any easements enjoyed by the would be exting­uished.
4. The right must lie in grant:
The right must be:
- granted by a capable grantor to a capable grantee (over 18 etc.);
- capable of reasonably exact description
- judicially recognised (within the tradit­ional list or maybe a new positive type of easement).

What is Land?

Land includes the surface, buildings or parts of buildings on the land, other corporeal heredi­taments and other incorp­oreal heredi­tam­ents.
Corporeal heredi­taments:
Physical things attached to the land - fixtures.
Incorp­oreal heredi­taments:
The benefit of any propri­etary rights the land has but which have no physical substance.
........Airspace and the Ground Below........
Airspace:
An owner’s rights in the airspace above his land are restricted to such height as is necessary for the ordinary use and enjoyment of the land and the structures upon it.
 
Above that height, the owner has no greater rights than any other member of the public.
Lower airspace:
To such height as is necessary for the reasonable enjoyment of the particular piece of land.
 
If a structure overhangs the lower airspace of your property, that is a trespass irresp­ective of whether damage is caused to your property.
 
Cranes are deemed to be within lower airspace.
Upper airspace:
Hundreds of feet above the land and not interf­ering with any use of that land would not be trespass.
 
S 76(1) Civil Aviation Act 1982 grants immunity from trespass or nuisance for any innocent flight of aircraft.
Ground below:
Land ordinarily carries with it all that is beneath the surface.
 
A landowner is not entitled to all minerals under his land. All mines of gold and silver belong to the Crown.
 
If a landowner finds "­tre­asu­re" then that also belongs to the Crown.
 
Any coal under land belongs to the Coal Authority by virtue of the Coal Act 1938.
 
S 43 Infras­tru­cture Act 2015 effect­ively states there is no trespass at depths below 300 metres and therefore there is no need for the consent of the freehold owner to deep-level drilling.

Land Ownership

All physical land is owned by the Crown.
A propri­etary right of possession is called an estate in land.
Freehold estate:
Also known as the fee simple absolute in possession.
 
A right of possession which lasts until the current owner dies without heirs.
 
If the current owner dies without next of kin and without a will, the land is regarded as bona vacantia and the estate reverts to the Crown.
Commonhold:
A type of freehold estate.
 
Designed to meet needs of owners of properties where owners are interd­epe­ndent on each other.
 
No overall landlord.
 
There is a freehold owner and a commonhold associ­ation company.
 
The owner of each flat is a member of the associ­ation.
 
Associ­ation is respon­sible for mainta­ining the communal areas of the building.
Leasehold estate:
Also known as a term of years absolute.
 
A leaseh­older (tenant) may grant a lease of lesser duration out of their own leasehold, while still retaining the original lease.
- a sub-lease.
 
When a lease ends the right to physical possession of the land automa­tically reverts to the landlord.
Freehold reversion:
The residue of the estate after granting a lease.
Leasehold reversion:
The residue where the granter of the lease holds a leasehold estate.
The same piece of land may simult­ane­ously be subject to a freehold, lease, sub-lease etc.
Each estate holder could be described as the owner for the right to possession for their "­slice of time".

Sale of a Freehold Estate

Pre-ex­change:
After an offer is accepted, the buyer will make various enquiries before committing to a purchase by the formal exchange of contracts.
 
E.g. carrying out searches of the public registers and confirming that the seller actually owns the land.
 
The buyer will also want to find out about any propri­etary rights which benefit or burden the land.
..........Three-­Stage Process.........
1. Exchange of Contracts:
Voluntary and not legally necessary to transfer the estate, but common in practice.
 
Seller and buyer enter into a binding contract in which they agree the price and other terms.
 
The parties become legally committed to buy/sell the land.
 
Parties can pull out of the deal without legal liability until contract is entered into.
 
Buyer usually pays a deposit to the seller.
1a. Formal­ities:
S 2 LP(MP)A 1989
 
The contract must be in writing.
 
It must contain all expressly agreed terms.
 
It must be signed by both parties.
 
(Remember: a contract is not required to legally transfer the land).
2. Completion:
This occurs by way of a deed - S 52(1) LPA 1925.
 
The buyer pays the balance of the purchase money to the seller and the seller moves out of the property and hands the keys to the buyer.
 
The sale triggers a legal requir­ement to register the land.
2a. Requir­ements:
S 1 LP(MP)A 1989
 
The document must be labelled as a deed.
 
The deed must be validly executed (the seller must sign in the presence of a witness).
The buyer does not legally have to sign the deed but in practice both parties execute.
 
The deed must be delivered by dating the document.
3. Regist­ration:
The buyer sends the completed deed to the Land Registry.
 
For registered land -
Legal title transfers at the point at which the buyer is registered at the Land Registry.
 
For unregi­stered land -
Legal title transfers at the point of completion. First regist­ration of land must be registered within 2 months of completion or title reverts back to seller.

Land Regist­ration

..........Unregi­stered Land.........
The title inform­ation is contained in various old paper title deeds.
These are difficult to search through to:
- discover third party interests
- examine title deeds
- guarantee accuracy or compen­sation for error
- quickly and inexpe­nsi­vely.
..........Registered Land.........
Land has been registered at the Land Registry.
The register is a complete record f all matters relating to a piece of land.
Once regist­ered, a person's ownership is guaranteed by the State.
All inform­ation is held centrally and can be viewed online.
..........Regist­ering Unregi­stered Land.........
There is no obligation to register an unregi­stered title.
But, unregi­stered land must be registered if there is a transa­cti­on/­event which triggers compulsory regist­ration.
Each time that land is sold for the first time since 1 December 1990 it must be registered - first regist­ration.
..........Triggering Events.........
Apply to both unregi­stered and registered land.
If unregi­stered, the land must be registered for the first time.
If registered, the register must be updated.
The events:
- Transfer of freehold estate by sale, gift or court order.
- Grant of a lease for a term of more than 7 years.
- A first legal mortgage of the freehold or of a leasehold with more than 7 years to run.
- Assignment (transfer) of a lease of unregi­stered land with more than 7 years to run.
- An assent, vesting assent or vesting deed which is a dispos­ition of the freehold or a leasehold with more than 7 years to run (refers mainly to (transfers on death).
- The grant of a lease to take effect in possession more than 3 months after the date of the grant (i.e. future leases).

The Purpose of Land Regist­ration

............Mirror Principle...........
The register should reflect all matters that the property has the benefit and burden of.
Should be a clear and compre­hensive account of the ownership and rights of a piece of land.
A purchaser should only need to look at the register to understand who owns a property and what third party rights will bind the property.
However, an overriding interest is an interest that does not appear on the register but will still be binding on the owner of the legal estate and any buyer of it.
............Curtain Principle...........
The register records the legal title.
The the beneficial or equitable ownership of the land is kept off the title.
The purchasers need not be concerned with benefi­cia­l/e­qui­table ownership of the land.
............Insurance Principle...........
The accuracy of the register is guaranteed by the state.
If there is an error with the register, it will be corrected and anyone who has suffered any loss will be compen­sated (S 23 LRA 2002) - 'state indemn­ity'.

Registered Title to Land

When a piece of land is registered for the first time, it is given a unique title number and the details of the land owner and rights that benefi­t/b­urden a piece of land are recorded.
The Land Registry registered title documents are known as the Official Copy.
The Official Copy for each piece of land contains:
1. Property register:
A descri­ption of the property by reference to a filed plan.
 
The nature of the estate (freeh­old­/le­ase­hold).
 
The details of any propri­etary rights that benefit the land.
2. Propri­eto­rship register:
Details of the owner of the legal estate.
 
The class of title.
 
Any restri­ctions on the owner(s) ability to deal with the land.
3. Charges register:
Details of any burdens on the land.
 
Details of any leases granted out of the title.
.......................................
With the exception of those deemed by the LRA 2002 to be 'overr­iding', only interests that have been correctly entered on the register will be enforc­eable against a purchaser.

Classes of Title

Absolute Title
The best form of ownership.
 
Most properties are registered with this class of title.
 
The land is only bound by interests that are registered on the title or overriding interests.
Qualified Title
An owner may be registered with qualified title if the Land Registry is of the opinion that the title has some defect which it will then specify on the register.
 
Very rare to see someone registered with qualified title in practice.
Good Leasehold Title
Granted where the Land Registry is satisfied as to the title of the leaseh­older only and not the freeho­lder.
 
Could be the case where the freehold title is unregi­stered and where the applicant fails to submit evidence of the freehold title when applying to register his leasehold title.
Possessory Title
May be given by the Land Registry where the applicant is in possession of the property or is in receipt of rents and profits and there is no other class of title that can be given.
 
Where there are no title deeds to prove ownership or the deeds have been destroyed, Possessory Title would be given.
 
Usually given to those with a claim under ‘Adverse Posses­sion’ or ‘Squatters Rights’.
 
May mean that third party interests created before the date of first regist­ration will bind the property even though these are not noted on the title.

Legal Interests in Land

Mortgage:
Can be defined as a loan of cash, which is secured by rights granted over property.
 
Rights include the right to possess and sell the land in the event of default in the mortgage repaym­ents.
 
The borrower grants the mortgage, not the lender.
Easement:
A propri­etary right to use land which belongs to another.
 
Use is more limited than an exclusive right to occupy or use.
 
Must be granted for a term equivalent to a freeho­ld/­lea­sehold estate - i.e. forever or for a certain period - to be a legal easement.
 
Examples: rights of way, drainage, storage and parking on neighb­ouring land.
Rights of entry:
A right for a landlord to re-enter leased premises and end the leasehold estate in the event of tenant default or some other specified event; OR
 
A rentcharge owner’s right to hold the land if money owed in not paid.
 
Rentcharge = a legal right to receive a periodic sum paid by the owner of the land (very rare).
 
A right of entry in a lease = a forfeiture clause*.

Equitable Interests in Land

Restri­ctive covenants:
A covenant is a promise.
 
Restri­ctive covenants prevent a land owner from doing something on their land.
Estate contracts:
A contra­ctual right to a legal estate, whether freehold or leasehold.
 
Equity will order specific perfor­mance of a contract to create or transfer a legal estate, because each piece of land is regarded as unique.
 
This, together with the maxim that ‘equity sees that as done what ought to be done’*, results in an equitable interest arising from the contract.
Interests in a trust of land:
A piece of land may be placed in trust.
 
The benefi­cia­ry(s) has an equitable interest in the land.

Legal vs. Equitable Interests

............Remedies...........
Legal Interest
Equitable Interest
- wide range of remedies available
- remedies entirely at discretion of cour
- entitled to damages as of right
- not entitled to damages as of right
- no discretion as to the merits of the case
-
- equitable remedies may be available
-
............Enforc­ement...........
Enforc­ement of the interest against third parties differs in both cases.

Propri­etary Rights in Land

Propri­etary rights:
Can be enforced by an action in rem (use or possession of the land can be recovered).
 
The right holder will have a right to occupy­/us­e/r­estrict what can be done on the land in some way.
 
They do not have to settle for damages if they are deprived of their right.
 
Can be enforced against a third party.
 
Fixed list of propri­etary rights:
- freehold estate
- leasehold estate
- easement
- mortgage
- restri­ctive covenant
- estate contract
- beneficial interest in a trust of land
Personal rights:
Use/oc­cup­ation of the right cannot be recovered.
 
Can only be enforced by a personal action for damages if the right is breached.
 
Only bind the parties to that right.
 
Cannot be enforced against third parties.
Just because a particular use of land is recognised on the list of propri­etary rights, this does not mean the right is definitely propri­etary.
The nature, creation and protection of rights in land need to be consid­ered:
Nature of a right:
To have propri­etary status, a right must satisfy certain charac­ter­istics of that right.
 
E.g. If a right to park is an easement but the car is locked out of the garage so unable to use it, this does not fit with the definition of an easement.
Creation of a right:
Most propri­etary rights are subject to strict formality requir­ements.
 
Compliance with such formal­ities may ultimately determine whether the right is propri­etary or not.
Protection of a right:
If a right is propri­etary, is it enforc­eable against a third party?
 
To be enforc­eable against subsequent owners, the right must be registered at the Land Registry.

Fixtures

............The Legal Test...........
The degree of annexation test raises a presum­ption, that the thing in question is or is not a fixture which can then be rebutted by object­ively looking at the purpose.
1. Degree of annexation test:
The more firmly the object is fixed to the land or building, the more likely it is to be classified as a fixture.
 
Even if it is fairly easy to remove, its character is still prima facie that of a fixture.
 
If the object rests on the land by its own weight, it is generally considered to be a chattel.
2. Purpose of annexation test:
This test takes priority over the degree test
 
Considers why the object is attached to the land/b­uil­ding.
 
Was the object for the more convenient use or enjoyment as a chattel, or to enhance the land or building in some way as a fixture?
............Fixture vs Chattel...........
Fixture
Chattel
- intended to be permanent
- temporary
- a lasting improv­ement to the building
- no more than is necessary for the object to be used and enjoyed
- kitchen units
- ornamental items, e.g. pictures
- items installed by a builder are more likely fixtures
- easy to remove carpets and curtains
- bathroom fittings
- light fittings attached with screws
- chattels which form part of the archit­ectural design of a building
- kitchen appliances which are not integrated and can be removed without damage
- objects which cannot be removed without destru­cti­on/­damage
- securely affixed items which are affixed as such purely for better enjoyment of that item

Land Contracts

A contract to buy/sell is not the only type of land contract, but they all follow the three-­stage process.
............Formal­ities...........
1. The contract must be in writing
There is no scope for an oral land contract.
2. It must contain all expressly agreed terms
Terms must be incorp­orated by being set out in the document or by reference to some other document.
3. It must be signed by both parties
Terms may be contained in one document signed by both parties.
 
If the contract is to be exchanged, terms should be contained in 2 identical documents.
............Variations...........
Whenever a material term in a land contract is varied, that variation must also comply with the above formal­ities.
A material term is one which is essential to the nature of the contract.
............Applic­ation...........
Land contracts most often create a contra­ctual right to a legal estate
E.g. sale contracts, contract for lease, option agreement, right of pre-em­ption.
............Effect...........
A land contract may be created delibe­rately.
A land contract may be created through parties trying to create a valid deed but failing.
The courts will recognise an equitable interest in the land where a binding land contract exists.
Binding contracts pass an equitable interest in the land to the buyer - an estate contract.
An estate contract can only exist if the remedy of specific perfor­mance is available (i.e. C has clean hands).
An estate contract is a propri­etary right in land so it is capable of binding and being specif­ically enforc­eable against third parties.
To be binding on third party purcha­sers, an estate contract must be protected against third parties.
If the estate contract is not protected but the third party is a donee (gifte­d/i­nhe­rited land), the donee will be bound by a properly created estate contract.

Breach of Land Contract

Damages:
Common law remedy.
 
Available as of right.
 
Measured by the loss which C has suffered as a result of the breach.
Specific perfor­mance:
Equitable remedy.
 
A court order compelling the defaulting party to carry out positive contra­ctual obliga­tions.
 
Not available as of right; at the discretion of the court.
 
Regard will be had to the behaviour of both parties.
 
Must come with clean hands
Injunction:
Equitable remedy.
 
A court order restra­ining somebody from doing something, including breaching a contract by selling the land to someone else.
 
Not available as of right; at the discretion of the court.
 
Regard will be had to the behaviour of both parties.
 
Must come with clean hands

Lease vs. Licence

Lease
Licence
- Propri­etary right in the Land
- Personal permission to be on someone's land
- Capable of being enforced against third parties
- Can only be enforced against the grantor
- A tenant can sue a third party for nuisance or trespass
- A licensee is not entitled to sue a third party for nuisance or trespass
- Can confer the right of security of tenure
- No security of tenure
- Enforc­eable in rem
- Enforc­eable in personam
- Tenants under leases receive various statutory protection
- No statutory protection for licensees

Lease Requir­ements: Certainty of Term

Certainty of term can be shown by a fixed term or a periodic term.
Fixed term
Periodic term
- exists where the maximum duration of the arrang­ement is known from the outset.
- Techni­cally a lease for one period.
- Once created, neither party can unilat­erally end the lease earlier unless there is a break clause present in the lease enabling them to do so.
- Generally, weekly, monthly, quarterly, yearly.
-
- The period goes on extending itself automa­tically until either landlord or tenant give notice to terminate the tenancy - notice to quit.
-
- Can be created expressly (via written agreement) or impliedly (by looking object­ively at all relevant circum­sta­nces)
-
- The 'term' of the periodic tenancy depends upon the period by reference to which the rent is calcul­ated, rather than the intervals at which it is payable.

Lease Requir­ements: Exclusive Possession

Street v Mountford
Exclusive possession means the right to exclude all others from the property, including the landlord.
If a clause appears to defeat exclusion possession but has been inserted into a lease only to make what would otherwise be a lease, appear like a licence, it will be thrown out as a sham.
Certain scenarios may indicate that an occupier does not have exclusive posses­sion:
1. Retention of a key:
A landlord retaining a key to the premises may make it appear as if the occupant does not have exclusive posses­sion.
 
However, if the key is only retained for emerge­ncies, exclusive possession may still exist.
 
Is the right of access the landlord has restricted or unrest­ricted?
 
Restricted = likely exclusive possession.
 
Retention of a key will not determine the nature of arrang­ement either way.
2. Landlord provides services:
If a landlord provides attendance or services there is a licence.
 
Services include cleaning, changing linen etc.
 
This holds on the assumption that the services are actually carried out.
3. Sharing clauses:
If the landlord reserves the right to share the property with the occupiers or reserves the right to introduce others to share, this may mean there is no exclusive posses­sion.
 
The occupier cannot exclude whoever the landlord is able to introduce.
 
The sharing clause may be a sham.
 
In consid­ering whether the clause is a sham, the size and nature of the accomm­oda­tion, the relati­onship between the occupiers, the wording of the clause and whether the clause has been exercised should be consid­ered.
............Business Tenancies...........
The courts are more prepared to accept the reality of the label 'licence' than they are in the reside­ntial context as there tends to be more equality in bargaining power, with commercial leases often negotiated and parties legally repres­ented.
A high degree of physical control over the premises and conduct of a business on a land is likely to be indicative of a license.
If the occupation agreement contains a right for the landlord to relocate and move the tenant to altern­ative premises, it will not be a lease.

Leases: Formal­ities

The general rule:
DEED
 
To create a legal lease, a deed must be used.
 
The requir­ements of a valid deed are in s 1 LP(MP)A 1989.
Leases over 7 years:
DEED + REGIST­RATION
 
A deed must be used.
 
The lease must also be registered - this is compulsory.
 
If not regist­ered, the legal leasehold estate will not have been created.
Leases of 7 years or less:
DEED (binding as an overriding interest)
 
A deed must be used.
 
The lease need not be regist­ered.
 
Lease will still take effect as a legal lease.
 
Lease will be binding on a new freehold estate owner as an overriding interest.
Leases of 3 years or less:
NO FORMAL­ITIES (so long as requir­ements fulfilled)
 
No deed needed so long as:
1. The lease takes effect in possession
2. It is granted at best/m­arket rent; and
3. no premiu­m/fine is payable
 
The lease need not be regist­ered.
 
Lease will be binding on a new freehold estate owner as an overriding interest.
 
Examples:
- Short fixed term leases (max. term of 3 years or less)
- Express periodic tenancies (w/ tenancy agreement)
- Implied periodic tenancies (occupier is in possession and paying rent at regular intervals).

- Periodic tenancies are only short term when each individual period of tenancy is 3 years or less.
Equitable leases:
WRITING + TERMS + SIGNED BY BOTH
 
Parties enter into a contract for lease or try to grant a legal lease which fails to comply with the formality requir­ements.
 
The tenant will have an equitable lease (estate contract) if the agreement:
- is in writing
- contains all the terms
- is signed by both parties

Leases: Multiple Occupancy

If the occupiers together have the right to exclude all others, including the landowner, then there is likely a lease arrang­ement.
There could be one single lease (a joint tenancy) or several individual leases.
Joint tenancy:
All co-own­ers­/te­nants constitute one single entity.
 
They own/lease the whole property as one collective entity.
 
They are jointly and severally liable for the terms of the agreement.
Joint liability:
If one occupier left, the remaining occupiers would be liable for the whole rent payment, not an individual share of it.

Joint Tenancy: Requir­ements

1. Unity of Possession:
All must be entitled to occupy the whole of the premises.
 
No-one has exclusive use of any part
 
If the occupiers can show that they each have exclusive possession of a part of the property then it is possible for them to have individual leases of their own part.
2. Unity of Interest:
All must hold the same lease term and restri­ctions.
 
All must be jointly liable for the rent.
3. Unity of Time:
All of the occupiers’ interests must start at the same time.
4. Unity of Title:
All of the occupiers’ interests must derive from the same document or from separate but identical documents which are interd­epe­ndent (i.e. both would have been signed, or neither).
Where occupants do not have all 4 unities, they do not have a joint tenancy.

Easements: Formal­ities

Express legal easements:
Must be created by deed - s 52 LPA 1925.
 
Must be intended to be a deed; signed by grantor & witness; delive­red­/dated.
 
Easement must be substa­ntively registered at the Land Registry to be legal - s 27(2)(d) LRA 2002.
 
Benefit of the easement noted on the Propri­etary Register of dominant land's title.
 
Burden of the easement is noted in the Charges register of the servient land's title.
Express equitable easements:
Not been created properly?
Failed contract must be:
- in writing
- contain all terms
- signed by both parties.
 
Not grante­d/r­eserved for suitable duration term?
Must be:
- in writing
- signed by grantor.
 
No substa­ntive regist­ration needed for equitable easement to exist.